Dollar cost averaging can be your ally during a recession. If you think stocks will go down over the near term, i.e. the next one to two years, or that they will be range bound, this can be a good way to buy. Dollar cost averaging means spending a fixed sum at regular intervals over time, for example $300 per month for company X's stock over three years. Your return on any investment is dictated by the price at which you buy, so a low basis creates a defensible position. If you are in a market that is generally rising, you would of course fare better if you took the lump sum and invested it sooner rather than later. However, if you believe, as I do, that the Dow will go down further (and who really knows for sure) then it can be better to buy a bit at a time. It's impossible to predict the bottom. There are several brokerage firms that provide a service through which you can buy a fixed amount of stock every month, including fractional shares. Some companies will pay all the broker's fees as an incentive to buy their stock, and some of these are excellent companies. But others don't pay the fees and these can substantially diminish your returns. Brokerage firms that allow you to buy stocks this way and some excellent companies that will pay the fees for you are listed after the jump.
Continue reading "Dollar Cost Averaging the Recession" »
Emerson is a diversified blue chip with a market cap of $41 billion. It’s the world’s leading maker of power equipment for oil companies, and its businesses include automation systems, climate control, power technology, and electric motors. Recently, EMR posted another stellar quarter: sales were up 12%, and earnings per share 20% over last year. So far, so good, but let’s dig deeper. (chart above is the last three years)
Continue reading "Analysis Brief: Emerson Electric" »
Earlier this week, the New York Times ran an article entitled: That 70's Look: Stagflation. The gist of it? The US is experiencing slower economic growth that requires a rate cut by the Fed. This is coupled with rising commodity prices. Sounds like, seems like stagflation. Similar stories have appeared in the Telegraph (UK), Guardian (UK) and Wall Street Journal. For those who remember, the 70's were a difficult economic period. As you can see below, in a chart of the Dow, during the '73-'75 recession (indicated by the gray area) the index declined 28%. So what do I think will happen this time?
Continue reading "Stagflation: History Repeating" »
On November 30, Royal Bank of Canada (RY) reported net income for the final quarter 2007 of $0.97 a share, well under Wall Street’s expectation of $1.07. This negative earnings surprise sent shares tumbling 4.0 percent in one day. Royal, the largest bank in Canada, missed its target because of a $152 million subprime write down (CDOs and mortgage-backed securities). Of course, this pales in comparison to write downs at other major banks, such as UBS ($17.6 billion) and Citigroup ($18.2 billion this quarter alone). Royal Bank's CEO, Gordon Nixon, has gone on record saying it has no more than $1.0 billion linked to the U.S. subprime market. So what's in store for 2008? (Chart of the last three years above).
Continue reading "Analysis Brief: Royal Bank of Canada" »

It seems like it all began with Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain. It was a sculpture first and a building second. Ask anyone who has been there. But, it was a fascinating design and the start of architecture as sculpture around the world, although Gehry did take cues from Oscar Niemeyer, the designer of Brasilia. At any rate, the "new sculpturism" is here. I think it is an interesting contrast to the equally great Mies van der Rohe idiom of "less is more" that dominated a lot of the 20th century. Above is BMW's very sculptural headquarters in Munich, designed by Coop Himmelblau. More buildings as sculpture after the jump.
Continue reading "Sculpture is the New Architecture" »